10 Comments

“A man has been convicted today because of the content of his thoughts — his prayers to God — on the public streets of England…We can hardly sink any lower in our neglect of basic fundamental freedoms of free speech and thought.”

How can this be happening?!

Who is actually responsible for this? I mean the actual specific people who have facilitated this? What are their names? Bring them to account.

Expand full comment

The police and judiciary can surely sink no lower.

Can they?

Expand full comment

Yes they can. Arresting a grandmother for a phone call instead of the weekly barbarians that celebrate murder, torture, terrorists and Jew hatred.

Expand full comment

The great scholar Stephen Baskerville opines in his latest book that it is these judges and magistrates who ought to be in jail, not the blameless victims (mainly men) they're railroading into prison for political crimes.

Free speech in Oz came under attack initially - like so many other things - courtesy of the "family courts" aka involuntary divorce mills. The quaint judicial innovation of Restraining Orders meant that speaking to certain individuals was "breaching" the law and lookout if you did.

A friend of mine who's about to qualify for the aged pension is getting ready to go on the run at the ripe old age of 67. He was wrongly landed with one of these orders and in gestures of goodwill, tried to communicate with the woman involved. He's now been charged with saying good morning to her in public and also posting a letter in their joint neighbourhood. Given he's spend a total of eight months in a cage for trying to see his judicially kidnapped children years ago, he hasn't got much faith in the integrity of the "family violence" courts - out of control feminist lynching chambers in Victoria.

More disturbingly is the inability to find lawyers who will defend one's freedom of speech, association and movement. They're reluctant to upside the rivers of gold these due process fiascos provide them.

When the lunatic magistrates refer to "priors", they have conniptions if you point out that is a euphemism for trying to see one's stolen children. These courts are rotten from top to bottom.

Bettina Arndt is about the only other person publicly exposing what's occurring.

It takes one back to the strictures of St Paul on women.

Expand full comment

Comparing biblical teaching restraining unruly behaviour of women in churches and meetings is not the same as courts restraining access in families.

Expand full comment

I'm not sure what your point is.

Expand full comment

The teaching on women from Paul’s epistles is to restrain bad behaviour by women not deny fathers access to their families. Nowhere does the Bible deny that. In fact fathers and mothers are essential to a child’s development and sense of security.

Expand full comment

You're preaching to the converted. My point was that St Paul strictly opposed every principle of so called feminism and it would seem with good reason, given the destruction women have caused in the west over the last 30 years.

Expand full comment

The Bible tells us to as wise as serpents and innocent as doves. It also tells that we will be persecuted for our faith. We have to willing to pay the price.

Expand full comment

All very true, Paul.

Expand full comment