The Virologist Pope

If ever there was a world figure – let us not say “leader” – about which the phrase “this time he has gone too far” has ceased to have any meaning, it would be the current occupant of the See of St Peter.

As with Daniel Andrews, one feels that “he had gone too far” simply by being born.  Everything else has been downhill, at speed.

Catholic News Digest reported his week as follows:

Pope Francis denounces “anti vaxxers”, calls Covid jab refusal an “almost suicidal act of denial”.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-denounces-anti-vaxxers-calls-covid-jab-refusal-an-almost-suicidal-act-of-denial/?utm_source=digest-catholic-2024-03-21&utm_medium=email

Suicidal?  Denial?  Strong words, Your Holiness.  Are they even remotely plausible, let alone true?  And should you, of all people, be saying this?  Now?

As billions of Christians the world over prepare for the holiest of weeks, leading up to Easter, the titular head of the Catholic Church seems more focused on slandering those of us who, quite wisely, chose to avoid the jab.  Strange priority, right there.  Mike Yeadon has a similar view:

I’m not among those who have ever paid attention to what the Pope says. But even with that routine indifference, I surely can’t be alone in thinking “Why are you even thinking about this at this point?” What a bizarre public statement from him.

Obviously, the authorities have been lying about this from the off. But how is this even in his top five things to concern himself with?

Source: Mike Yeadon Telegram Channel.

Yes, I know, he has a book to market.  Yet …

In addition to having warped priorities, clearly the current pontiff is not a man of science.  Does he know that science is about proposing and testing hypotheses, about gathering real-world evidence to support theories (like the claim that Covid vaccines are 95 per cent effective), about Popperian falsifiability?  I suspect not.

Nor does he read the news.  Well, not the truth-telling news.  If he did, he would know that the Covid jab was always ineffective, not needed and dangerous.  The Pope clearly hasn’t caught up with peer review.  My simple question to the rabidly pro vaxx Pope would be – if the jab works, why would you even care that I hadn’t had the jab?  And if it didn’t work, why would I get it?

All of the emergent science on Covid vaccines shows that:

·         Big Pharma cheated on the trials;

·         Governments corruptly offered emergency approval to the vaccine manufacturers;

·         Governments have falsely demonised alternate treatments for Covid;

·         The political class has lied about vaccine safety since the get-go;

·         The media has lied to the public about the vaccines;

·         The “95 per cent safe” narrative was never true, and is now known to have been never true;

·         Dissidents, typically globally respected virologists and epidemiologists, have been routinely silenced, de-platformed;

·         Those who challenged the narrative are globally respected scientists and medical practitioners;

·         The evidence about excess deaths following the roll-out of the Covid jab is compelling.

The evidence on vaccines is all negative, overwhelming and getting even worse as time goes by.  Just because the mainstream media don’t report this doesn’t make it magically go away.  It continues to roll out, with fresh revelations, studies and reports on a daily basis.

For example, Epoch Health reports:

Researchers Warn Against Blood Bank Contamination From mRNA Vaccinated Individuals.

Since there are no reliable ways to separate spike proteins and mRNA from vaccinated blood, authors recommended discarding their usage.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/japanese-preprint-calls-for-mrna-vaccines-to-be-suspended-over-blood-bank-contamination-concerns-5613006?utm_source=Aohealth&src_src=Aohealth&utm_campaign=Aohealth-2024-03-23&src_cmp=Aohealth-2024-03-23&utm_medium=Aoemail&est=LeurRP9xil8N%2BAxCY3gqD1hPJ9E4jzm%2FsFrBmPPpaZvGSw5K7%2Fbt8QZp0V82pg8YGOobWQ%3D%3D

Florida’s surgeon general states, unequivocally:

The vaccines aren’t appropriate for use in humans”.

Steve Kirsch states:

We were told that the COVID vaccine saves lives. But I haven't found a single medical practice where that was true. I did, however, find a medical practice with a 5X mortality increase!!

Deanna Kline, RN, MSN, AGNP has been with a geriatric medical practice in the US for over 7 years (size ~1,000 patients). The practice has been in existence for 39 years.

Prior to 2021, all-cause deaths per year ranged between 7 to 10 people.

In 2020, the height of COVID, there were just 7 deaths!

In 2021, there were 13 deaths.

In 2022, there were 36 deaths.

In 2023, there were 48 deaths.

That’s nearly a 5X increase in all-cause deaths.

Deanna attributes the huge increases to the COVID vaccine.

US geriatric practice reports that COVID vaccines increased mortality by nearly 5X

Then we have Ed Dowd:

“Ed Dowd Releases Damning Report; Stunning Cancer Rise in 15 to 44-Year-Olds”

Source: Truth About Covid Telegram channel.  Next there is Peter McCullough:

Maternal deaths have skyrocketed in America, and the CDC “doesn’t know” what’s causing it.

According to a CDC report: “The maternal mortality rate for 2021 was 32.9 deaths per 100,000 live births, compared with a rate of 23.8 in 2020 and 20.1 in 2019.”

That’s a 38.2% increase compared to 2020 and a 63.7% increase from 2019.

This increase in maternal deaths has “erased four decades of progress in obstetrics,” remarked Dr. Peter McCullough.

“And in that manuscript, there’s no mention of COVID, and there’s no mention of the vaccines. They’re simply reporting this bad news that pregnant American mothers are now dying at alarming rates. This is in a US federal government publication. I think everybody listening to this should be alarmed.”

Source:  Truth About Covid Telegram channel.  Perhaps the Pope should be looking at some of this material.

I know His Holiness isn’t big on large families – breeding like rabbits? – but perhaps all of us should be a tad concerned with the massive sterilisation going on post the vaccine rollout.

From his recent and not-so-recent utterances, it is clear that the Pope bought the big Covid lie – that it was the vaccines, and only the vaccines, that could and did end the lockdowns and other madnesses of Covid exceptionalism.

Referring to the COVID-related lockdowns as a “grim scenario,” Francis stated that “[t]his grim scenario began to change with the arrival of the first vaccines,” …

This was always a blatant false binary, that only fools would have bought lock, stock and barrel.

This overwhelming evidence, and the Pope’s incomprehensible ignorance of it, suggests (pretty obviously) that the current Pope is an ideologue with little interest in the truth.  He does not understand that his preferred globalist mates are tyrannical liars who hate freedom and rights.  And souls.  Or, perhaps, he knows all this.  Which of these is worse?

But there is more, alas.  The man from Argentina – a Peronist’s Peronist – is also the nasty pope.  It shows plainly in his latest tirade.  Rebekah Barnett (Dystopian Downunder) describes what Francis and others (like Jack the Insider at The Australian and a host of others) have been doing to the unjabbed heroes as “toxic labelling”.  A pretty good description.  Again, setting aside the Pope’s strange priorities, you actually don’t expect popes to be nasty, to be engaging in toxic labelling.  To be keeping a spiteful narrative bubbling along.  To be triggering good, innocent and wise people.  You expect at least good manners from the leader of a Christian church, even if he is hopelessly misinformed on issues.  As this one is.

Pierre Kory notes:

The hatred directed against the unvaccinated came first from the lie the vaccine was 95% effective, then once that lie was exposed, on the lie it prevented hospitalization and death.

Source: Pierre Kory Telegram channel.

Yes, it is, indeed, hatred we are seeing here.  “Nasty” and “pope” are not two words normally seen in the same sentence.  Think of his immediate predecessor, Joseph Ratzinger.  A man of sublime intellect, learning, humility, empathy and understated, saintly poise.  Or of his predecessor’s predecessor, St John Paul II.  A man of piety, self-control and turbo-charged forgiveness, as witnessed by his gentle and meek meeting with his would-be assassin.  No grumpy, superior “I told you so” attitude there.

No, nasty popes are not something that any Catholic, nor anyone else, for that matter, has ever encountered, or at least not in any of our lifetimes.  He is old and in pain?  A grumpy old pope?   So was Pope Karol of Poland.  He endured serious, grappling pain for a considerable time, and endured it with almost unimaginable equanimity and grace.

Even if one didn’t know about the Argentinian Pope’s previous dozens, possibly hundreds, of crimes and misdemeanours, this latest effort would take one’s breath away. 

But let’s review the record.

Just think of making climate scepticism a sin, inviting de-population, pro-abortion publicists to Vatican conferences, worshipping Amazonian gods, blessing same-sex unions, bullying and sacking “conservatives” like Cardinal Raymond Burke, removing opponents from Vatican jobs, protecting sex abuse priests, worshipping at the altar of gay culture, , embracing globalist puppet-masters like Schwab, abusing traditionalists, smashing their preferred Latin Mass, having routine, snide cracks at Catholics who have big families or who oppose abortion with anything approaching vigour, and driving ludicrous synods on synodality.  Whatever the last even means.  Does he himself know?

Yes, the list is long.  The list is impressive in its own way.  If only the College of cardinals had recall elections, for conclaves gone horribly wrong.

Jeffrey Tucker notes, in relation to the Covid hell we didn’t need:

Has the dust settled?

Far from it. It is everywhere. We are choking on it. The storm cloud comes in many forms: inflation, learning losses, ill-health, high crime, non-functioning government services, broken supply chains, shoddy work, displaced workers, substance abuse, mass loneliness, discredited authority, a growing real estate crisis, censored technology and overweening state power. 

For that matter, consider that Easter, the day to celebrate the Son of God’s triumph of life over death, itself was cancelled for public worship just four years ago. That actually happened. Not even at the height of World War II was there a consideration of such a thing, or even cancelling baseball. When the idea was suggested in a famous movie script, Spencer Tracy asked “Why would you abolish the thing you are trying to preserve?” (Woman of the Year 1942).

Good question. What precisely was the point of the hell we went through? Who did it and why? Why did it last so long? Why has there been no official accounting?  (Emphasis added).

https://dailysceptic.org/2024/03/25/four-years-later/

If the Pope simply has to involve himself with matters Covid, you might think that is to some of these first order questions that he might better be turning his attention.  Rather than having a cheap, post-hoc, massively ill-informed swipe at those he clearly disdains.  They say the greatest sin is pride.  This Pontiff seems to have it by the bucketload.

The Pope picked on heroes and ignored Covid’s criminals.  Craig Kelly says:

Anyone that sanctioned the use of coercion, threats of discrimination, and/or bullying to force others to inject this experimental substance (which had zero long term safety data) should be charged with human rights abuses and crimes against humanity.

Source:  Craig Kelly’s Telegram channel.

People died from the jab.  Blood on hands, and all that.  But this isn’t just a matter of history.  The threats to our medical wellbeing are current, real, serious and prospective.  So, the Pope’s fresh support for the vaccines provides ongoing solace to criminals and thugs.  The German microbiologist Sucharit Bhakdi send an important message via video in Geneva today:

"The [mRNA] program is being expanded since the WHO generally intends to replace conventional vaccines in human and veterinary medicine with mRNA injectables.

The WHO tells us that the COVID vaccines have shown their safety, so any quality control of future [mRNA] agents is entirely unnecessary. Dear fellow citizens, for the sake of your loved ones, never forget this: Uptake and expression of a foreign gene will always cause attack of the immune system on [the affected] cell. Since all further mRNA vaccines will encode non-self, they will cause harm that will worsen with every booster.

And for sure, contamination of mRNA vaccines will be the rule because no cost-effective procedure exists to reliably separate mass produced mRNA from plasmid DNA.

The WHO [mRNA] program threatens mankind."  (Emphasis added).

Source:  Covid Truth Network telegram channel.

Threatens mankind!  Nothing could be more frightening, you wouldn’t think.  Thoughts, Your Holiness?  Who are the bad guys here, do you think?

A Catholic traditionalist friend, knowing of my early 2020 intention to visit Rome, said, possibly half-jokingly, “are you taking a gun?”  And no, I wasn’t, and didn’t.  Instead, I walked right into the Covid red zone.  But that is another story.

That any Catholic could even think such a thought about a pope would once have been considered, well, unthinkable.  These days, there are a whole lot of papists who are so disoriented, so discombobulated, so pissed off with being insulted and delivered faux-theology, progressive ideology and utter drivel, that such thoughts are, well, at the very least, understandable.

Is it possible for a Catholic to detest a pope?  In 2024, that idea is certainly in play.  At every Catholic Mass, in the Prayers of the Faithful, the congregation is enjoined to pray for the Pope.  Clearly, we aren’t praying nearly hard enough.

Clearly, the Pope can’t forgive us.  His snarling, misplaced anger is enduring.  The question arises, should we forgive the Pope?  He should be begging our forgiveness, not only for the abuse, but for being such a staunch supporter of globalist Covid narratives, and, shockingly and without rebuke, allowing his archdioceses all over the world to shut their doors to the faithful, all because of a less-than-flu virus.  The latter was an act of wickedness.  For using his sacred office for malevolent purposes, in 2020-21, during the rabid policy madness and associated tyranny, and, alas, now.

I won’t be buying the Pope’s book.

Paul Collits

26 March 2024