Blind Freddie can see – has seen – the Covid State’s strategy of determined silence in the face of unassailable evidence that its totalitarian policies were unfit for purpose. To put it at its most polite. The shutting down of societies, the useless mask mandates, the vaccine lies, the crushing of whole societies and individual rights, have been exposed, ad infinitum.
Australia’s heroic Covid Five – Antic, Rennick, Roberts, Canavan and Babet – refuse to lie down on the issue. To their eternal credit, as policy distractions to bury Covid crimes have mounted. Wars, floods, voices, climate crises, Bruce Lehrmann. And the rest.
One of the principal recent foci of the truth-tellers has been “excess deaths”. That is, the astonishing coincidence of a sharp increase in “all cause deaths” that has occurred precisely from the time of the mass Covid vaccine rollout. Here is a definition:
Excess mortality is a term used in epidemiology and public health that refers to the number of deaths from all causes during a crisis above and beyond what we would have expected to see under ‘normal’ conditions.
https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid
In the case of Covid, several pre-Covid years (2015-19) were used, both by the UK Government and by the OECD (the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) as base years for comparison.
The truth-tellers recently got a boost, with the British Covid hero Andrew Bridgen’s attempt to get the mother of parliaments (the House of Commons) to focus on the issue. Bridgen MP, expelled from the Tory party for speaking truth to Tory Covid power, was granted 30 minutes to make his case. In the absence of a real Covid inquiry. The public gallery was full. And cheering. The floor of the House was … empty. And silent. As the constituents of the absent MPs on all sides continue to die, in record numbers, on their watch and without their interest. It took Bridgen twenty goes to get the Parliament to agree to let him speak at all. That is serious censorship.
Kathy Gyngell at TCW reported:
LAST Friday [20 October] Andrew Bridgen’s debate on excess deaths finally took place after twenty rejections of his attempt to raise the topic. As we reported, his tour de force on the data and its analysis pertinent to the recorded fact of excess deaths was delivered to an almost empty Commons Chamber, though the public gallery was full. It is however important that we acknowledge those few MPs who did attend and participate. Of them, Sir Christopher Chope, Philip Davies, Danny Kruger and Esther McVey all spoke, and spoke well. Esther McVey challenged Maria Caulfield from the Department for Health about the role of the MHRA.
Afterwards Andrew made this short speech outside Parliament, thanking the people who came to support the debate – really worth watching. Democracy is under challenge all over the world, he said. He also flagged a Bill he is bringing to Parliament today to stop the World Health Organization power grab. He is a truly courageous, hardworking and representative MP. We have much to be grateful to him for forcing these issues into an extremely reluctant and either scared or in denial Parliament. (When I was in touch with him today and he told me that MPs are being inundated with emails from constituents asking why they didn’t attend. So keep those emails going readers!)
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/andrew-bridgens-heroic-debate-on-excess-deaths/
Here is what the mighty Bridgen had to say:
We have experienced more excess deaths since July 2021 than in the whole of 2020. Unlike during the pandemic, however, those deaths are not disproportionately of the old. In other words, the excess deaths are striking down people in the prime of life, but no one seems to care. I fear that history will not judge this House kindly. Worse still, in a country supposedly committed to the free and frank exchange of views, it appears that no one cares that no one cares.
That line is chilling. No one cares that no one cares. It is the same in Australia. As Bridgen says, no issue could be more serious. Certainly not voices to parliament for selected racial groups. He continues:
The surveillance systems designed to spot a safety problem have all flashed red, but no one is looking.
Very odd for governments which, for over two years, claimed to be so vitally concerned about saving “every life” that they embarked upon a nut-job policy of “Covid zero”.
Some of Bridgen’s key points were:
· The patterns were repeated across countries;
· The rise in excess deaths has not let up;
· It is almost impossible to get to the bottom of it, since data are hidden;
· Statistics agencies manipulate data to minimise excessive death counts;
· There are a significant number of young people among the death counts;
· Excess deaths increased in 2022-23 among the old, when we should have expected fewer deaths among the old;
· There was a sustained increase in ambulance call-outs;
· There were rising disability payments.
The irony of what Bridgen calls “an eerie silence” over excess deaths is pretty astonishing. We will all remember the daily doses of Covid death porn, where unelected public health officials – who have mostly been since made governors or have landed other sinecures, without ever being held accountable for their crimes and lies – and their political bosses held court and gave breathless updates of the deaths and injuries counts.
This went on every damned day for nearly two years. Then it suddenly all stopped. They kept their jobs, unlike the many who refused the jibby-jab, and did not keep theirs. Then, they couldn’t stop talking about deaths. Now – nothing. Not a peep. And when they were talking about deaths, they were largely fabricating a narrative. Like counting as “cases” irrelevant positive PCR tests among the perfectly healthy. They were counting as Covid deaths anyone who died having had a positive PCR test. There was the infamous case of a “Covid death” in the USA of someone who died having been run over by a bus. The American hospitals got more government money if you died of (with?) Covid. And, of course, the greater the number of deaths broadcast daily, the greater the return to the State from fear porn.
The existence of excess deaths since 2021 across Western countries is not in dispute.
What are disputed are the extent and, more importantly, the causes of the excess deaths. But governments have figured, don’t let anyone talk about any of it! If we can just get the fact of excess deaths out of the news, well, no one will talk about what might have caused them. And no one will figure that it was our State injectables that killed many of the people. Injectables that WE forced the masses to take.
When you think of it, there have been a whole range of death types during Covid that governments have wanted to ignore, and for which they have enlisted various branches of the State to help suppress. The list includes not only deaths from the poisonous vaccines, but the avoidable Covid deaths that resulted from the State’s decision to block effective non-vaccine Covid treatments; deaths that directly or indirectly resulted from lockdown madness; the suicides; the old people killed by ventilators and end-of-life drugs – Covid era euthanasia; and the possibly millions of ill people who were denied timely treatments due to keeping the mostly empty hospitals, well, empty. Cancer patients are simply the most obvious.
A pretty impressive list, and every last category on the list was subject to determined efforts by governments to simply flush down the memory hole. God knows how many deaths we are talking about, worldwide. The greatest health cover-up in history. No need for a Covid inquiry, then.
And it isn’t just Covid governments that have been on the case to suppress the issue of excess deaths. It is a whole-of-Covid-class effort. The fact checker industrial complex is on board, seeking to besmirch those who seek to raise the issue and, especially, to link it to the vaccines.
https://www.rmit.edu.au/news/factlab-meta/no-credible-evidence-vaccines-behind-excess-deaths
The search engine monopoly provider does its bit as well. Search for any evidence about excess deaths or vaccine deaths and you will be referred straight to the establishment fact checkers.
The evidence on excess deaths is beyond compelling.
And backed by “the science”. The same “science” to which the Covid class endlessly appealed during the plandemic. If it were a matter of mere correlation, it would be, you would think, worth an investigation. Even if only to debunk the “conspiracy theorists”. But when there is evidence of causation – links between excess deaths and Covid vaccines – you would think it was a no brainer.
One autopsy-based study (by McCullough et al) found that 74 per cent of Covid era deaths-following-vaccines could be attributed to the vaccines. (Note that this study isn’t about excess deaths per se, but is germane to them).
The rapid development and widespread deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction and carcinogenicity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.
The big story here, though, was the cancellation of the study by The Lancet after 24 hours.
The determination of the Covid class to kill this issue has been something to behold. Criminal brazenness doesn’t do it justice. Dystopian Down Under (Rebekah Barnett) has drawn our attention to the crimes of Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration, among myriad bad actors. The Daily Sceptic’s headline read:
Australia’s Drug Regulator Admits it Doesn’t Know Extent of Covid Vaccine Harm.
It doesn’t know because it isn’t interested in knowing. Rather, it is interested in NOT knowing.
Barnett has also been looking at the attempts by the media to smear Bridgen, as part of the strategy to shore up the official Covid narrative:
When dealing with inconvenient information that contradicts the power structure’s preferred narrative, legacy media functioning as a propaganda arm have two options:
1. Don’t report it at all (i.e.: media blackout) or,
2. Delegitimisation through framing techniques.
… In his speech, Bridgen gave a thorough rundown of the UK’s mortality situation, including flaws in the official data, lethal Covid care pathways, and safety concerns with the jabs, such as the recent revelation that the mRNA shots are contaminated with plasmid DNA at levels above regulatory limits.
The content of Bridgen’s speech is inconvenient to the official narrative that the government’s pandemic measures were necessary and appropriate, and that the Covid shots are safe and effective.
The continuation of this narrative benefits government and institutional officials who imposed the measures on the UK public, as it allows them to dodge accountability for their failures. It also benefits the stakeholders whose profits would be threatened if the public came to the conclusion that perhaps the pandemic measures and vaccine products were not so necessary, safe or effective after all.
With Bridgen, the media’s response has involved both of Barnett’s two strategies – the silent treatment and delegitimisation. The BBC actually overlaid the live stream of Bridgen’s speech in the House of Commons with video captions contradicting what he was saying. This is capital F “framing”. By the UK public broadcaster!
Barnett continues:
The BBC’s overt attempt at narrative control in the live-streaming of Bridgen’s address to UK Parliament, coupled with a media blackout on the debate in the remainder of the legacy media, offers a hint about the formation of power structures in the UK.
In corporatist authoritarian societies, narrative control is part of the media’s broader role of manufacturing consent for government policies, and demand for the products of corporations.
This top-down model is antithetical to the bottom-up classical liberal democratic model, in which those in charge are supposed to govern by the will of the people. In this model, the media have the dual mandate of keeping the public informed so that it can vote appropriately, and using their cultural authority to keep the government in check.
Indeed. Barnett has also written of the recent campaign by the Australian Medical Professionals’ Society:
Earlier this year, Australian Senators voted down a motion calling for acknowledgment of Australia’s record-high excess deaths, and the need for an inquiry.
Now, the Australian Medical Professionals’ Society (AMPS) has taken it upon themselves to conduct an independent inquiry, and they’re taking it to Parliament House, Canberra [on 18 October 2023].
AMPS has written a substantial book on this, Too Many Dead.
https://amps.redunion.com.au/too-many-dead
Must read. Trialsite News (paywalled) has called AMPS’ work a “bombshell”.
Never in the history of public health have public health officials and their political superiors have been so little interested in public health. On its face, it is hard to imagine a public health issue more important than a massive spike in excess deaths.
But it turns out that Andrew Bridgen does have friends. Coincidentally, Mark Miller has shared this with his readers:
Dying of "vaccination" (along with his mother), Pascal Najadi, son of WEF co-founder, calls for the ARREST of Gates, Schwab, WHO leadership, Big Tech, Pfizer
One excess death of which, you might think, the elites might take some notice. This emerging story is also covered by the Richardson Post (formerly the Pickering Post, run by the late Larry Pickering).
Rebel News notes:
Having successfully filed criminal charges against the Swiss president [the soon-to-resign Alain Berset] for allegedly misleading the Swiss people on Covid-19 vaccinations. Pascal Najadi is now taking the fight to Pfizer.
As Mike Yeadon says of Najadi’s reported efforts to sue the Swiss Government and the complicit, Geneva-based institutions that ran global Covid policy:
Arranging events such that 5.7 BILLION people were injected with an intentionally harmful material is the greatest capital crime in human history.
Nothing to see here? So it seems.
Paul Collits
29 October 2023
good on you mate!
We are all trying to bring truth and justice never give up the fight , we the freedom movement is alive keep up the pressure,many are giving there all keep going as they can't do it alone, unvaxed unmasked unmuzzled unafraid