It has been known for some time, at least among some of the people, that the recent appearance of increasingly compelling evidence of substantial excess deaths in Australia and elsewhere coincided with the mRNA Covid mass vaccinations. (One of whose developers just won a Nobel prize). This is despite near total silence on the subject among legacy politicians and assorted Branch Covidians sprinkled throughout the ruling classes.
Under normal circumstances, such insouciance on the part of a governing class that claims endlessly to be concerned about public health would be surprising, to say the least. In these (almost) post-Covid times, however, where governments which are engaged in one long cover-up about the vaccines, and their fellow travellers, silence any questioning of the preferred narrative through the various platforms they control, the non-interest in excess deaths is merely to be expected.
A recent study has thrown fresh and alarming light on the phenomenon of excess deaths. Megan Redshaw of Epoch Health reports:
A new scientific report challenges the idea that COVID-19 vaccines have prevented deaths after researchers assessed all-cause mortality in 17 countries and found COVID-19 vaccines did not have any beneficial effect on reducing mortality. Instead, researchers found that unprecedented peaks in high all-cause mortality in each country—especially among the elderly population when COVID-19 vaccines were deployed—coincided with the rollout of third and fourth booster doses. (Emphasis added).
The report, published Sept. 17 by Correlation Research in the Public Interest (pdf) (not yet peer-reviewed), quantified the vaccine-dose fatality rate (vDFR) for all ages—which is the ratio of inferred vaccine-induced deaths to vaccine doses delivered in a given population. After analyzing mortality data, the researchers calculated a mean all-ages fatal toxicity by injection of vDFR of one death per 800 injections across all ages and countries. This equates to 17 million COVID-19 vaccine-related deaths worldwide from 13.25 billion injections as of Sept. 2, 2023.
"This would correspond to a mass iatrogenic event that killed (0.213 ± 0.006) % of the world population (1 death per 470 living persons, in less than 3 years), and did not measurably prevent any deaths," the authors said. They found the overall risk of death induced by COVID-19 vaccines is 1,000 times greater than previously reported in data from clinical trials, adverse event monitoring, and cause-of-death statistics obtained from death certificates.
A mass iatrogenic event, indeed. Pfizer’s little nugget appears to have turned out to be a weapon of mass destruction. A killing machine.
It should be noted that studies like these establish correlation, not causation. Other (autopsy based) studies have gone further, and found that it was, indeed, the jab “what did it”. At least, in 75 per cent of cases.
Stephanie Seneff, a senior research scientist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), told The Epoch Times in an email:
It is highly disturbing that these authors have found a consistent trend among seventeen countries showing a significant increase in all-cause mortality coinciding with extensive COVID vaccine rollout. Their estimate of one death for every 800 injections globally is alarming.
Indeed. “Alarming” is putting it mildly. Steve Kirsch, referred to below, has placed the ratio at one in one thousand deaths.
Mind you, the claim that the Covid vaccines are toxic and massively harmful is not new, and this recent study won’t be any surprise to the Covid-awake. It is just that those who recognise the painfully obvious links between the Covid jab and excess deaths contain very few from the political class or the globalists running the show. The latter are the same people who find a (possible) miniscule and harmless increase in global air temperatures “alarming”. Go figure.
Are these numbers realistic? According to Dr. Norman Fenton:
It is likely that fewer than 10% of deaths and other adverse events ever get reported.
The routine under-reporting of vaccine harms is widely recognised. No, not by the Covid class, but by reputable observers without axes to grind or careers to protect. The Covid class has a vested interest in vaccine harms being massively under-reported. They want to keep it that way.
The extent and the level of officially driven Covid subterfuge has been gargantuan. This is one, only one among many, of the items of unfinished business from the Covid crimes regime. Whatever the numbers really are almost doesn’t matter, and one shouldn’t be hung up on the numbers. The Covid class will always seek to diminish the numbers of deaths from the jab, and they will always attempt to diminish the credibility of those who (they say) talk up the numbers. They and their fact-checker class mates have also made it their life mission to attempt to debunk anyone who makes headlines from mass vaccine deaths. Steve Kirsch, founder of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, is a particular target. Just search “steve kirsch vaccine deaths study” on the Alphabet lying machine and you will get the picture. This is a classic feint by the powers-that-be.
https://www.vacsafety.org/
As one example of his tireless and valuable work, Kirsch highlights recent Western Australian data that reveals yet another alarming story (referencing the popular vlogger Dr John Campbell):
How could anyone not notice this? In 2021, there were 0 deaths reported for all other vaccines combined but 87 reported for the COVID vaccine. That's not "bad luck." That's a disaster.
… My calculations show that the West Australia stats imply a vaccine kill rate of at least 223 deaths per million doses which is a VERY deadly vaccine that should never have been put on the market. It means we are killing at least 5 people for every 1 person we MIGHT save from a COVID death. This is nonsensical.
Meanwhile, governments all over the world continue to push the vaccines on all that are foolish enough to take their advice. Absent mandates, this is still murder in the old language. (Mercifully, now the take-up of Covid jabs in the USA is a mere 20 per cent).
That said, while the suggestion (in the Correlation Research study referred to above) of 17 million vaccine related deaths ought to be enough to get some political attention, indeed, purchase, the death rates from the jab among the very old are also noteworthy, and are the main focus here. Why? Because the whole of phase one of the utterly evil and disastrous Covid policy sequencing – lockdowns – was said to be about “protecting the aged”.
Steve Kirsch is also digging into vaccine deaths among the aged (in the USA):
The US nursing home data shows that the COVID vaccines increased the odds of death from COVID by 6%. The result is highly statistically significant.
… This is the most comprehensive dataset on the single most important demographic for COVID:
More than 40% of the COVID deaths were from nursing homes in the beginning of the pandemic.
Kirsch’s work, which he is seeking to turn into a peer reviewed study, will, no doubt, give rise to another tsunami of vigorous yet spurious fact-checking by the Covid class.
The Covid State’s approach itself sits oddly with the utter indifference of modern governments to care for the aged, an indifference that is, sadly, matched by that of many citizens. Two markers of the indifference on the part of the State are, first, the push towards free, open and ever-expanding euthanasia access being rolled out across the globe, and second, the appalling state of aged care services, including, perhaps especially, in Australia. A recent Royal Commission concluded as follows:
We have found that the aged care system fails to meet the needs of our older, often very vulnerable, citizens. It does not deliver uniformly safe and quality care for older people. It is unkind and uncaring towards them. In too many instances, it simply neglects them.
https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-12/interim-report-foreword.pdf
A shocking tale of neglect. Hmmm.
It strikes you as odd that a stated, almost paranoid level of concern about “killing granny” during Covid lockdowns and vaccine mandates (the latter being phase two of the Covid policy sequencing) was such an important part of the State’s appeal to citizens when the State, in fact, cares so little about the welfare of the aged. Despite what is sometimes said about “dignity”.
As far as the State is concerned, it is clear that the aged are a burden. The same for the green cabal that now runs the world, the members of which (like the Club of Rome, Bill Gates and so on) routinely preach lowering the world’s population. The Covid virus itself, seemingly manufactured through the combined auspices of Chinese virology and American Government research money, and which picked largely on the old, the obese and the weak, might be seen, a little like the neutron bomb, as being specifically engineered as a population control device. (The neutron bomb, never deployed, was designed to kill people and leave buildings intact). It is, at least, a plausible hypothesis. Both the virus and the vaccine have been marvelously effective killers of the elderly.
And what of the appalling of the treatment meted out to the elderly during the inhumane lockdowns?
They were, reflexively, shunted off to hospitals, where people were coming to get Covid. And to die. To die alone, with separated loved ones peering through the glass as their parents and grandparents passed away, alone and utterly discombobulated. Often with the help of the lethal remdesivir and the lethal ventilators. That is all very clear, now. All documented. And ignored. In many cases, certainly in Andrew Cuomo’s New York, they were shunted there, unconscionably, in order to get more Federal US funding. More love for the elderly? I think not. This was, at best, criminal negligence, and at worst, and far more likely, mass murder. Serial killing. Unpunished murder of the aged. This is, decidedly, mixed messaging in relation to “care” for those in their autumn and winter years.
A question inevitably arises.
If the “pandemic” was created for the vaccine rollout and not the reverse, as I and others (like Reiner Fuellmich) have posited, has the apparently catastrophic level of excess deaths among the very old associated with the vaccine been a tragic side-effect of the virus, or policy? Are we talking about something far greater and more sinister than “convergent opportunism”, as Mike Yeadon christened it?
The vaccine has certainly aided the cause of population reduction, whatever the intent of its mass, global rollout. Just look at the impact of the vaccine on pregnant women and on male sterility and female fertility.
And a Venn diagram covering eugenicists and the eugenics-adjacent (such as the Julia Gillard-chaired Wellcome Institute, Bill Gates and Rupert Murdoch) on the one hand and vaccine cheer squadders on the other is likely to show a healthy overlap. Those who want a far smaller global human population are sprinkled through the Covid magnifier class.
Here, absent proof and (as yet) a smoking gun, we are simply left with the (disputed) facts and the need for eternal vigilance in relation to the political class.
None of this surmise seeks to avoid or de-emphasise the deadly impact of the vaccines on the young and healthy, who are dying in droves from myocarditis, an affliction of which almost no one had heard before Scotty from AstraZeneca and his political chums here and abroad came along, avidly spruiking and mandating a (lethal) non-cure in search of a non-problem. The deaths among the young might even be regarded as more serious for our society than the deaths of those who died with/from Covid beyond their life expectancy.
The whole, sordid, Covid episode has so many still unanswered questions.
At least some of these relate to the question of care for the aged. To their dispensability. And to the evil agendas of those who fervently believe – and say so when they think the microphones are off – that the dignity of individual humans is not the main game. And that those surplus to requirements can be dispensed with. In the name of “higher” goals, like the sustainability of the planet. Those who cheer for the elderly should actually do so. When they don’t, we might reasonably conclude that they don’t mean it. And that at least some of them have far more nefarious agendas in play.
Paul Collits
11 October 2023
Fantastic article Paul! My mother is in aged care and she is the only unvaccinated resident. She has not had Covid and is the only resident who has not deteriorated excessively or died during this scamdemic time.
I hope you can get this published somewhere. Great article that needs to be widely read.