Someone called Jikkyleaks – aka “the whistleblowing lab mouse” – has just had a post published at The Daily Sceptic, which asked:
Did the Australian Chief Medical Adviser to the Therapeutic Goods Administration just lie to the Senate?
The Sceptic went on:
In a video posted on X, the Senator for Queensland, Malcolm Roberts, challenges the Chief Medical Adviser for the TGA, Prof. Robyn Langham, on the scandal that the TGA knew that lipid nanoparticles went to all organs.
https://twitter.com/jikkyleaks/status/1712029830034928074
Roberts, as always, is a Covid hero.
The issue, now that we know beyond any doubt that the mRNA Covid vaccines have all sorts of nasty side effects, including inducing female and male sterility as well as myocarditis, is whether mRNA particles travel to any other (or all) of the body’s organs rather than staying at the point of injection. And who knew this, and when they knew it. Pfizer (an active campaigner for the Indigenous voice, incidentally) certainly did.
Brain Injuries After COVID Vaccination | The Epoch Times
This makes them criminals. But we knew that. Now the question, for Australia, is whether our own TGA also knew, and said and did nothing. If they knew, and knew of the likely consequences, this would make them criminals too. (No doubt, Albanese’s Covid non inquiry will look into this).
After all, the TGA states that it has high standards:
The TGA closely monitors reports of suspected side effects (also known as adverse events) to the COVID-19 vaccines. This is the most intensive safety monitoring ever conducted of any vaccines in Australia.
Nothing to worry about, then. Mind you, it is a pity that the TGA makes it so hard to people to get to the truth. And they hid Covid vaccine deaths.
The TGA is already the subject of a class action in relation to vaccine harms.
And they banned the use of ivermectin to treat Covid patients, of course, to protect the commercial interests of the vaccine manufacturers. Doing so cost lives.
As noted above, Professor Langham, these days, is Chief Medical Adviser to the Therapeutic Goods Administration, whose recently departed head, John Skerritt, the United Australia Party’s Craig Kelly thinks should be in prison for Covid crimes against humanity. Previously, Langham has been employed at very senior levels by Monash and Melbourne Universities as a medical researcher and linked to Royal Melbourne Children’s Hospital and the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute. The latter was started I the 1980s by the late Dame Elizabeth Murdoch, the wife of Keith Murdoch, one of Australia’s best-known eugenicists, and (of course), the father of Keith Rupert Murdoch.
Langham was, inevitably, given a government (Queen’s Birthday Honours) gong in 2022.
I don’t want to focus on whether Langham lied to the Senate. As Jikkyleaks says, draw your own conclusions. There have been enough lies told about the virus and the vaccines, including by “reputable experts”, already to establish beyond any doubt that the Covid State cannot be trusted. On anything. No, there are other issues here.
Jikkyleaks’ post reminds us, yet again, of the sheer reach of the tentacles of Australia’s medical industrial complex and of the labyrinthine, indeed, sinister, connections among researchers, universities, government and Big Pharma. The latter’s funding practically keeps our universities and legacy media afloat.
The MIC makes it hard to track down all of the funding connections, but you can if you try. The old rule, “two clicks to Bill Gates funding”, works here, as usual. The Gates Foundation provided a $10m grant in early 2020 – it is almost as if Bill knew that Covid was coming, and was ready to swoop – to the University of Melbourne and the MCRI for, yes, vaccines research. Langham has been affiliated to both.
Ivor Cummins has examined at length the process and motivations for the transition from capitalist to philanthropist to global powerbroker, with special reference to the Rockefellers. It all started with John D Rockefeller, he of Standard Oil. Rockefeller’s descendants, especially David (of Chase Manhattan Bank), took up the method with enthusiasm. Cummins recognised that such people, very early on, cottoned onto the opportunities for global control and power afforded by medical philanthropy. A lesson certainly appreciated by Bill Gates.
But the role of the medical funding cabal is only one part of the murky picture whose surface professor Langham has merely scratched. It also contains the researchers and their institutes, the universities, government bureaucrats and – God help us the regulators. When the regulators are part of the inter-connected Covid architecture, you know rigging is complete. Britain’s equivalent of Australia’s TGA is the MHRA, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. It is now known that the MHRA receives Gates funding, despite the soothing words of the MHRA in response to a freedom of information request:
The MHRA does not receive financial contributions or donations.
We do receive funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as well as other sources outside government such as WHO. This funding mainly supports work to strengthen regulatory systems in other countries.
This is scarcely believable. Did someone say Dracula and blood bank? Yes, it took an FOI request to obtain this information. The first statement is risible. Fiona at Covileaks has noted that the MHRA, the British gatekeeper for vaccine harms, is 86 per cent funded by Big Pharma. America’s FDA (Food and Drug Administration) is notorious.
But it isn’t only the Brits whose public health regime is utterly compromised. Medscape UK reports:
'Institutional Corruption' Permeates Drug Regulators Globally.
The organisations supposedly overseeing the authorisation of new medicines are not sufficiently independent from the companies they are meant to regulate, according to a new investigation by The BMJ that asks the question: From FDA to MHRA: are drug regulators for hire?
"Industry money saturates the globe's leading regulators", said Dr Maryanne Demasi PhD, an investigative journalist from Australia, in the light of her research into the funding of six national drugs regulators from across the globe, including the UK, Europe, Australia, Canada, Japan, and the US.
Dr Demasi, whose work is focused on "holding governments and public health authorities to account", raised significant questions about the influence funding has on regulatory decisions.
Startlingly, Demasi found:
In Australia, 96% of the Therapeutic Goods Administration's fees came from industry, the highest proportion of all those in the investigation. (Emphasis added).
Right on cue, Wikipedia states that:
As of 2022, Demasi is a writer for the Brownstone Institute, an organization that has been criticized by medical experts for spreading misinformation against vaccines.
All of this reveals a secret web of mutual dependence.
· The universities need the money.
· The researchers need a steady stream of funded research projects to get kudos and career advancement.
· Governments and politicians get to cite “independent” researchers in support of their diabolical policies to show they are “following the science” and that their decisions are justifiable. The scientists told us to do it! The Governments need this. It enables them to deflect blame when something goes terribly wrong. Like with Covid. It enables them to trot out the line that they have, about “what we knew at the time”, etc.
· The funders get both kudos and global power.
· The legacy media gets to exist.
· Big Pharma gets its drugs approved, in the case of Covid without even the remotest evidence of long-term non-harm.
· Bill Gates gets even richer with all his investments in the vaccines. Vaccines approved by regulatory agencies that he himself funds! Vaccines that kill people.
· The ease with which participants in the MIC move between nodes is something to behold. We saw it with Brett Sutton, with Daniel Andrews Victoria’s “face of Covid”, who recently slunk off to a CSIRO sinecure, and with Greg Hunt, Scotty from AstraZeneca’s Health Minister and one of Covid’s chief spruikers, now ensconced at the University of Melbourne and working as “an honorary enterprise professor”.
· The fact-checker industrial complex, embedded in places like Wikipedia, gets a steady conga line of clients.
No doubt, they all go to each other’s weddings. Langham’s career progression is simply par for the course. As is Jane Halton’s. (Halton, many readers will know, is our very own Covid Tsar, Bill Gates’ Aussie Girl, leading participant in Event 201, which somehow predicted Covid very precisely ahead of time, and a sister-in-law of Brett Sutton).
These are the winners from the scam, along with the lap-top class which remained utterly faithful to the narrative. Good work if you can get it. In this maze of deceit and crime – for that is what it is – the victims are Jo(e) punter, truth, public health, victims of vaccine harm, those who lost their jobs during the Covid mandates. We are all victims, in fact, when democratic government controlled through elections becomes shared “governance” and where global corporations merge with the State in countries that are, allegedly, still democracies.
As Medscape noted:
Patients and doctors expect regulators to provide an unbiased, rigorous assessment of new medicines before they hit the market.
Indeed. They are supposed to be there to protect us, not to kill us.
So, whether Professor Langham was telling the truth or not to the Senate about the behaviour of Pfizer nano particles, though consequential and therefore important, is merely one element of a much bigger scandal. A scandal that continues to this minute and shows no sign of being challenged, even acknowledged, in the institutions that run our world.
Paul Collits
13 October 2023
It has certainly been obvious for some time ( like 2 + years ) that there has been criminal behaviour in the Panic Virus Scam. The pertinent question is, how do we bring these criminals to account given that many if not all of them are in positions of power ?
I must urge everyone to read Alexander Durgin’s book “The Great Awakening vs. The Great Reset.” This brave Russian philosopher intimately understands the situation the world is in and his solution is to spread awareness of the Great Awakening. He argues many people across the world are against the Great Reset and progressive liberalism, and our best chance to defeat our elite masters is to make the Great Awakening a serious movement. He makes many profound points and presents an interesting history of liberalism. The book takes an hour or so to read.
The book is only available from the publisher in both print and digital form for $4.95. It has been banned elsewhere, of course.
It is not merely enough to oppose the Great Reset. We must, with great passion, unite together and find common ground to defeat our enemies with others in the world. Time is running short, however. Spreading the word is imperative.
Here is the link to purchase the book.
https://arktos.com/product/the-great-awakening-vs-the-great-reset/